CT-based planning of transcatheter pulmonary valve implantation in patients operated for Tetralogy of Fallot and Double Outlet Right Ventricle
Author Block: P. Marakhouskay, P. Chernoglaz, K. Marakhouski, K. Drozdovski; Minsk/BY
Purpose: The aim of the study was to quantify the method of planning transcatheter pulmonary valve implantation (TPVI) in patients who have undergone surgery for congenital heart defects(CHD) by measuring in both ECG and non-ECG gated CTA sizes of pulmonary artery(PA).
Methods or Background: 22 patients with CHD as Tetralogy of Fallot and Double outlet Right Ventricle(DORV), operated in infancy, were included into study and divided into two groups: study group, in which direct intravascular balloon sizing of PA was performed, and control group in which TPVI was rejected for excessive artery size without performing angiography.
CTA of all cases were retrospectively analyzed and 4 sizing zones were measured: RVOT, supravalvular zone, middle-segment of and bifurcation zone of PA. After that calculations to find appropriate patient -specific sizing methods by comparing parameters with an actual stent size were made (MedCalc Software Ltd, Ostend, Belgium; https://www.medcalc.org;2022).
Results or Findings: Analysis showed no significant correlation between diastolic RVOT sizing with any other measuring points or an actual stent size (P=0,0004). Only supravalvular zone was accepted as an independent residual in regression analysis (F-ratio 22, P=0,0004).
After implementing a regression equation to calculate appropriate size of PA stent on the control group, all the stents exceeded 30 mm (TPVI exclusion point). Mann-Whitney U-Test showed that the significant difference between an actual stent size and calculated size for study group (U 91,00,P = 0,5678) and no significant difference between calculated sizes of two groups (U 0,50 P = 0,0004).
Conclusion: Our study showed that any cardiac CT-based preTPVI landing zone sizing in diastolic phase can be based solely on measuring supravalvular zone of PA (r= 0,7992, F-ratio 22, P=0,0004), especially as an exclusion criteria (U 0,50 P = 0,0004).
Limitations: None
Funding for this study: No funding
Has your study been approved by an ethics committee? Yes
Ethics committee - additional information: Approved by the Ethics Committee of the NACPS No. 11 22.03.24.