Role of incidental pancreatic calcifications on computed tomography as opportunistic biomarker for chronic pancreatitis
Author Block: A. Pata, F. Rizzetto, C. B. Monti, A. Vanzulli; Milan/IT
Purpose: To evaluate whether incidentally detected pancreatic calcifications on computed tomography (CT) serve as a reliable biomarker for chronic pancreatitis as defined by clinical criteria.
Methods or Background: We retrospectively reviewed CT scans from adult patients between 2014 and 2024, identifying cases where "pancreatic calcifications" were mentioned in the radiology report. Patients with known history of pancreatitis or pancreatic surgery were excluded. For each patient, we recorded pancreatic size, calcification characteristics (number, size, and location), and other features of chronic pancreatitis, such as duct dilatation or intraductal calculi. Clinical data, including pain, abdominal symptoms, and risk factors for chronic pancreatitis, were also collected.
Results or Findings: A total of 137 patients with incidental pancreatic calcifications were identified. A small subset had coarse calcifications (n=9, 7%), while the majority had both coarse and punctiform calcifications (n=102, 74%), with calcification numbers ranging from 7 to 50 in over half of the cases. In 121 patients (88%), at least two pancreatic segments were involved, most frequently the head (n=125, 91%) and the body (n=112, 81%). When coarse calcifications were present alongside duct dilation, the duct caliber was significantly larger (6.7 mm vs 4.1 mm; p=0.026), while the tail was slightly smaller (17 mm vs 19 mm, p=0.018), with no significant differences in the size of the head or body (p>0.198). Among patients with available clinical information (n=38), only 3 (11%) reported symptoms such as abdominal pain, diarrhea, or bloating, and none (0%) reported weight loss. Elevated alcohol consumption or smoking history was not associated with calcification type or location (p>0.186), pancreatic size, or duct dilation (p>0.317).
Conclusion: Incidentally detected pancreatic calcifications are not a reliable biomarker for screening for chronic pancreatitis.
Limitations: The main study limitation is its retrospective design.
Funding for this study: No fundings were received for this study
Has your study been approved by an ethics committee? Yes
Ethics committee - additional information: Institutional Review Board approved the retrospective data collection in anonymous form