The use of oligometastatic disease in routine radiology practice: a real world data analysis
Martin J. Willemink, San Diego / United States
Author Block: J. Wu1, A. De Araujo2, S. Khozin3, M. J. Willemink1; 1Palo Alto, CA/US, 2São Paulo/BR, 3Cary, NC/US
Purpose: Oligometastatic disease (OMD) refers to a state of metastatic cancer, characterized by a limited number of metastatic lesions. Local treatments such as ablative therapy could potentially be curative to OMD. OMD-diagnosis is based exclusively on imaging findings. OMD challenges the older binary view of cancer as either localized or metastatic. Given the importance of imaging findings for diagnosing OMD, we explored the use of OMD in real-world radiological practice.
Methods or Background: We evaluated clinical radiology-reports from USA-located healthcare systems. Healthcare providers ranged from imaging centers, small- and medium-sized hospitals, to academic and oncology-focused providers. A real-world imaging data platform was used to search, filter, and select radiology reports (Segmed).
Results or Findings: A total of 33,747,977 reports of 11 radiology modalities (including X-ray, MRI, CT, and PET) from healthcare providers in 40 states were included in the search. OMD was mentioned in 164 radiology reports from 109 different patients. Clinicians provided OMD-information in the indication and history in 148 radiology reports of 95 patients, while radiologists mentioned OMD in 18 reports of 17 patients. OMD was mentioned in 20 different primary tumor-types, most commonly breast (n=39 reports of 22 patients), lung (n=33 reports of 26 patients), and prostate cancer (n=16 reports of 13 patients). Modalities with OMD-mention included CT (n=58), X-ray Angiography (n=44), PET/CT (n=35), MRI (n=26), and X-ray (n=1). The first mention of OMD was in 2017 (n=2 reports), which increased to n=33 in 2024.
Conclusion: In this large scale observational study, we found that despite the importance of imaging, the term OMD is rarely used in routine radiology practice in the USA. These results suggest the need to improve the definition and guidelines around OMD.
Limitations: Retrospective study with only US data, no EU data.
Funding for this study: None
Has your study been approved by an ethics committee? Not applicable
Ethics committee - additional information: