3D MRI- Based Virtual Radiographs Of The Pelvis For Assessment Of Acetabular Coverage And Version
Author Block: J. Roshardt1, S. Steppacher1, M. K. Meier1, S. Sommer2, R. Sutter2, F. Schmaranzer2; 1Bern/CH, 2Zürich/CH
Purpose: Hip deformities require precise diagnosis before joint-preserving surgery, but standard radiographs and CT scans involve ionizing radiation, raising concerns about cumulative exposure, particularly in younger patients. MRI offers detailed, radiation-free imaging of bone morphology and soft tissues. Advances in deep learning enable automatic segmentation and MRI-based 3D pelvic modeling, allowing virtual radiographic-like projections. This study determined if standard radiographic parameters (lateral center-edge angle [LCEA], retroversion index [RI], and acetabular index [AI]) can be accurately measured on MRI-based projections compared to conventional anteroposterior (AP) pelvic radiographs.
Methods or Background: Fifty patients (100 hips, mean age 28 years) with symptomatic hip deformities underwent evaluation with standard AP pelvic radiographs and direct hip MR arthrography (including T1-w VIBE DIXON). Osseous pelvis was segmented using a validated 3D nnU-Net, cortical bone contrast augmentation and radiograph-like projections were generated using a cone beam projection algorithm. Arthrography and non-contrast sides were analyzed separately. Parameters were measured on both imaging modalities and compared using t-tests and Pearson's correlation.
Results or Findings: The LCEA showed no significant difference between conventional and MRI-based projections, with absolute mean differences of 0.2±1.2° (arthrography, p=0.71) and 0.6±1.7° (non-contrast, p=0.29). Similarly, AI showed no significant difference (0.6±1.5° arthrography, p=0.20); 1.±2.1° (non-contrast, p=0.075). For RI, absolute mean differences were 0.5±4% (arthrography, p=0.80) and 2.±5.3% (non-contrast, p=0.22), indicating no significant difference. Moderate to strong correlations were found between MRI-based and conventional radiographs (LCEA: r=0.84/0.77, AI: r=0.75/0.66, RI: r=0.60/0.66 for arthrography/non-contrast; all p<0.001).
Conclusion: MRI-based radiographic-like projections, whether with or without contrast agents, provide measurements comparable to AP pelvic radiographs for key hip morphology parameters. This approach eliminates radiation exposure while maintaining diagnostic accuracy, offering significant advantages for young patients requiring repeated imaging for hip deformity assessment and surgical planning.
Limitations: No external validation
Funding for this study: Funding received by the Swiss National Science Foundation (porject no. 205091)
Has your study been approved by an ethics committee? Yes
Ethics committee - additional information: Ethics committee of the University of Bern