Assessing Image Quality in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Comparative Study of EOS and X-ray Imaging
Author Block: M. F. Mcentee, A. England, C. Rainey, A. O’Donovan, S. Coakley, J. O'Neill; Cork/IE
Purpose: Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) is a spinal deformity requiring accurate, high-quality imaging for diagnosis and treatment. While Digital Radiography (DR) remains the gold standard, EOS, a low-dose, biplanar imaging system, have emerged as an alternative. This study compares EOS and DR formage quality for whole-spine X-rays.
Methods or Background: A quantitative design assessed whole-spine imaging using anthropomorphic phantoms in two size configurations: Standard and Large. AP and lateral images were acquired with EOS and DR. Subjective image quality was assessed via a Visual Grading Analysis (VGA) questionnaire completed by 39 radiology professionals. Objective image quality was evaluated using Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) and Contrast-to-Noise Ratio (CNR) metrics on ImageJ software, with statistical analysis via SPSSv27.
Results or Findings: Subjectively, DR scored higher in AP projections (standard: 72%vs.68%, p = 0.015; large:64%vs.60%, p=0.0004), while EOS led in lateral views (standard: 73%vs.69%, p=0.0001; large: 66%vs.60%, p<0.0001).EOS received more “Good” and “Moderate” ratings, but DR had more “Perfect” scores. Both DR and EOS had nearly identical numbers of "Inadequate" ratings. Objectively, DR showed higher SNR and CNR values, but significance was only seen for SNR in the large phantom AP view (DR 46.05 vs. EOS 28.00, p=0.004). Both systems showed reduced image quality with increased phantom size.
Conclusion: EOS demonstrated more consistent imaging across sizes and projections. DR showed marginally better SNR/CNR in some conditions. Subjective results favoured DR in AP views, and EOS in the lateral. Both modalities offer comparable image quality. EOS remains a promising option for AIS imaging; however, several key factors must be considered.
Limitations: Future research should involve real patient imaging, ideally in a multicenter, prospective design. Including a diverse sample of AIS patients would allow assessment of diagnostic performance, interobserver agreement, and real-world utility.
Funding for this study: None
Has your study been approved by an ethics committee? Yes
Ethics committee - additional information: Ethics was approved by the School of Medicine's Social Ethics committee