Six years of prostatic artery embolisation (PAE): a comprehensive and critical single-centre, single-operator retrospective analysis of 551 cases
Leona Soraja Alizadeh, Frankfurt a. Main / Germany
Author Block: L. S. Alizadeh, C. Booz, I. Yel, D. Radek, T. Vogl; Frankfurt a. Main/DEPurpose: The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and outcomes of prostatic artery embolisation (PAE) in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) over a six-year period at a single centre and to discern its impact on clinical symptoms, prostate volume, and procedural specifics.Methods or Background: A single-centre retrospective study was conducted, analysing 551 PAE interventions performed by a single interventional radiologist from January 2017 to July - The study reviewed technical specifics, changes in prostate volume, PSA levels, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), Quality of Life (QoL) scores, International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), and procedural radiological metrics.
Results or Findings: The average age of patients was - 81 years. A significant majority underwent bilateral embolisations in a single session (435 out of 551) with particles predominantly sized 100-300 μm (441 out of 551). Post-intervention, there was a notable reduction in prostatic volume (mean decrease of 9.66 ml) and PSA levels (mean decrease of 0.32 ng/ml). Symptomatic relief was evident with a substantial drop in IPSS (mean decrease of 9.17) and improved QoL scores (mean decrease of 1.74). IIEF scores showed a slight increase post-procedure. The average fluoroscopy time was 25.23 minutes, with an average dose area product (DAP) of 25452.08 μGym².
Conclusion: PAE emerges as a potent therapeutic intervention for BPH patients, offering symptomatic relief, reduction in prostate volume, and a favorable safety profile. We reported increasing patient numbers since the implementation of the technique. This single-center experience provides a comprehensive insight into the real-world applicability and efficacy of PAE.Limitations: Single centre retrospective trial limits the scope of this study.Funding for this study: No funding was obtained for this study.Has your study been approved by an ethics committee? YesEthics committee - additional information: The ethical approval was received from the Institutional ethics committee with a waiver for informed consent.