Longitudinal integrated diagnostics in GEP-NET patients undergoing PRRT
Author Block: F. Herr, C. A. Dascalescu, R. Ebner, M. L. Schnitzer, J. Ricke, M. Heimer, M. Brendel, R. Werner, C. C. Cyran; Munich/DE
Purpose: To evaluate the prognostic value of integrated clinical and laboratory biomarkers for longitudinal overall survival (OS) prediction in patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) undergoing [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT).
Methods or Background: In this retrospective single-center study, 178 patients with histologically confirmed, well-differentiated (Grade 1–2) GEP-NETs treated with PRRT between 2012 and 2023 were included. Clinical and laboratory parameters (BMI, CRP, albumin, leukocytes, erythrocytes, hemoglobin, platelets, NSE, CgA) were collected at baseline, follow-up 1 (FU1; after 2 cycles), and follow-up 2 (FU2; after 4 cycles). Optimal cut-offs were determined using maximally selected rank statistics. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed; model performance was assessed by Harrell’s concordance index (C-index) and Akaike Information Criterion (AIC). Kaplan–Meier analysis with log-rank testing was applied.
Results or Findings: Median OS across the cohort was 70.1 months after a median follow-up of 60.8 months. At FU1, albumin ≤ 4.1 g/dL and CgA > 299 ng/mL were independent predictors of shorter OS. At FU2, albumin ≤ 4.5 g/dL, NSE > 29.1 ng/mL, and CgA > 179 ng/mL retained independent prognostic value. Models combining these biomarkers showed superior prognostic accuracy (C-index up to 0.77) compared with single-parameter approaches. Kaplan–Meier analyses confirmed significant separation between high- and low-risk groups.
Conclusion: Longitudinal assessment of albumin, NSE, and CgA provides independent and complementary prognostic information in PRRT-treated GEP-NET patients. Integration of these biomarkers into multivariable models improves OS prediction beyond baseline or single-marker assessment, supporting their role in personalized follow-up and treatment planning.
Limitations: Retrospective, single-center design; external validation in multicenter cohorts is required.
Funding for this study: No
Has your study been approved by an ethics committee? Yes
Ethics committee - additional information: This retrospective single-center study was approved by the local ethics committee (approval number 19–027). Due to the retrospective nature, informed consent was waived.