A Morbidity-Mortality Scale to Assess Outcome in Occlusive Arterial Acute Mesenteric Ischaemia
Author Block: H. Garnier1, S. Thavarajah1, S. Vilain1, M. Ronot1, L. Garzelli2; 1Clichy/FR, 2Paris/FR
Purpose: Outcomes of arterial occlusive acute mesenteric ischaemia (AOAMI) are usually reported as short-term survival, which underestimates long-term morbidity. We aimed to propose a morbidity-mortality scale to provide a more comprehensive outcome measure for clinical trials in patients with AOAMI.
Methods or Background: Retrospective, single-centre study including patients admitted for AOAMI (2016–2023). Clinical, biological, imaging, treatment and outcomes data were analysed. A four-level morbidity-mortality scale was developed according to post-AMI status: 0 = bowel preservation, 1 = bowel resection, 2 = intestinal failure and 3 = death. The primary outcome was the distribution of the scale at 1, 3, 6 or 12 months.
Results or Findings: A total of 256 patients were included (median age: 68; 44% female). Overall, 149 (58%) underwent bowel resection and 73 (29%) developed short bowel syndrome during follow-up. Thirty-five patients (14%) required long-term parenteral nutrition, including 16 (6%) with >4 infusions per week. At last follow-up, one-third of patients (33%) had a digestive stoma. Scale distribution was as follows: scale 0 (bowel preservation) stable at 32%, 30%, 30% 30% at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months ; scale 1 (resection) stable at 24%, 24%, 25% 24% at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months ; scale 2 (intestinal failure) decreased from 25% to 15% from 1 to 12 months ; scale 3 (death) increased from 19% to 31% from 1 to 12 months.
Conclusion: This new morbidity-mortality scale captures both survival and functional outcomes, providing a comprehensive measure of disease burden in AOAMI. It could serve as a novel endpoint in future therapeutic trials.
Limitations: Limitations include the retrospective, single-centre design, which may entail missing data, selection bias, and limited generalisability.
Funding for this study: None
Has your study been approved by an ethics committee? Not applicable
Ethics committee - additional information: