18F-FES-PET/MRI for Axillary Staging in ER+ Breast Cancer: Diagnostic Accuracy and Optimal SUVmax Cutoff
Author Block: T. Spiegel1, D. A. Resch1, S. Rasul1, O. Lafcı1, N. Pötsch1, P. Clauser1, P. A. Baltzer1, K. Pinker-Domenig2, T. H. Helbich1; 1Vienna/AT, 2New York, NY/US
Purpose: 18F-Fluoroestradiol (18F-FES) is a novel radiotracer, and little is known about its role in axillary lymph node (LN) staging in estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer (BC) on PET/MRI. This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic performance of 18F-FES-PET/MRI for axillary LN staging in ER+ BC and to define optimal thresholds.
Methods or Background: This retrospective analysis of prospectively acquired single-center study data includes 37 female patients with 38 ER+ BCs, who underwent 18F-FES-PET/MRI using a Biograph mMR system (Siemens, Germany). Semiquantitative PET parameters including SUVmax of axillary LNs were assessed by placing a volume of interest (syngo.via, Siemens) on the most suspicious LN identified on MRI. Histopathology from biopsy or surgery served as the reference standard. Statistical analysis included Shapiro-Wilk test, t-test, and ROC analysis with AUC and Youden's index; p<0.05 was considered significant.
Results or Findings: Histopathology confirmed 21 metastatic and 17 benign LNs. Metastatic LNs showed higher uptake (mean SUVmax 2.60, 95% CI 1.91-3.29) than benign LNs (0.98, 95% CI 0.81-1.16; p<0.001), with an AUC of 0.852. An SUVmax cutoff of ≥1.56 yielded a specificity of 100% (17/17), sensitivity of 66.7% (14/21), PPV of 100% (14/14), NPV of 70.8% (17/24), and accuracy of 81.6% (31/38). Lower thresholds improved sensitivity but markedly reduced specificity. Subgroup analysis showed a trend toward higher uptake of metastatic LNs in invasive lobular carcinomas (ILC, n=5, mean SUVmax 3.61, 95% CI 1.33-5.89) compared to invasive ductal carcinomas (IDC, n=16, mean SUVmax 2.29, 95% CI 1.59-2.98; p=0.087).
Conclusion: 18F-FES-PET/MRI allows reliable LN characterization in ER+ BC. An SUVmax cutoff of ≥1.56 offers excellent specificity and overall accuracy, with higher uptake trends in lobular compared to ductal carcinoma.
Limitations: Retrospective, single-center design, and limited sample size.
Funding for this study: OeNB Anniversary Fund AB18207ONB
Has your study been approved by an ethics committee? Yes
Ethics committee - additional information: EK Nr. 510/2009