Evaluating the Safety of Selective Internal Radiation Therapy for Primary and Secondary Liver Malignancies: A Study of 4,432 Patients
Author Block: A-I. Nica1, T. J. Vogl1, F. Wacker2, R. Klöckner3, C. Booz1, L. S. Alizadeh1; 1Frankfurt/DE, 2Hannover/DE, 3Lübeck/DE
Purpose: To evaluate the safety profile of Selective Internal Radiation Therapy (SIRT) in the treatment of primary and secondary liver malignancies, with a specific focus on the incidence and management of periprocedural complications.
Methods or Background: We conducted a retrospective analysis of data from the national quality assurance registry maintained by the German Society of Minimally Invasive Therapies and Interventional Radiology (DeGIR), covering the period from 2018 to 2023. The study aimed to identify adult patients (aged >18 years) who underwent SIRT for liver tumors. We evaluated the incidence, types, and management of complications, classifying them as either 'procedure-related complications' (PRCs), occurring during or within 24 hours of the intervention, or 'post-procedure complications' (PPCs), defined as those arising more than 24 hours after the procedure.
Results or Findings: The study included 4432 patients (1563 females, 35.3%; 2869 males, 64.7%) with a mean age of 67.4 ± 11.4 years. Most SIRT-related complications were PRCs (36 cases, 0.8%), mainly due to drug side effects (5, 0.1%) and arterial bleeding (3, 0.1%). Nearly half (45.7%) were Category 2/B, requiring prolonged monitoring. One death (Category 6/F, 2.9%) occurred within 24 hours post-intervention. In 50% of cases (18), complications were managed by the interventional radiologist, 27.8% (10) by other specialties, 16.7% (6) required no treatment, and 5.6% (2) were unspecified. PPCs occurred in 4 patients (0.09%), for a total of 40 patients (0.9%) with periprocedural complications.
Conclusion: Our findings suggest that SIRT is a safe procedure for patients with liver tumors, as it demonstrates a low incidence of complications, with many being effectively managed within the same medical specialty.
Limitations: The main limitation of this study is its retrospective design.
Funding for this study: This study received no funding.
Has your study been approved by an ethics committee? Yes
Ethics committee - additional information: This study received approval from the Ethics Committee.