Quantitative DCE parameters combined with apparent diffusion coefficient to evaluate molecular typing of gastric cancer
Author Block: Y. Liangliang, J. Li, J. Qu; Zhengzhou/CN
Purpose: To explore the feasibility of quantitative DCE parameters derived from DCE-MRI combined with ADC values to predict the molecular typing of gastric cancer (GC).
Methods or Background: 43 patients were enrolled in this retrospective study. Mean values, 10th, 25th, 50th, 75th, 90th percentile values of quantitative DCE parameters (Ktrans, Kep, Ve) and ADC values were manually extracted. The specimens were performed with five biomarkers, including EBER in situ hybridisation, MLH1, PMS2, E-Cadherin and P53. According to the different expression results, they were divided into five molecular types. The aberrant E-cadherin group and aberrant P53 group were combined into a high-grade malignant group, and the other three groups were combined into a low-grade malignant group. The quantitative DCE parameters or ADC values between two malignant groups were compared.
Results or Findings: There were significant differences in Ktrans mean, Ktrans 25%, Ktrans 50%, Ktrans 75%, Ktrans 90%, Kep mean, Kep 10%, Kep 25%, Kep 50%, Kep 75%, Kep 90%, Ve 10%, Ve 25% and ADC between two malignant groups of GC (p = 0.006, 0.044, 0.007, 0.007, 0.009, 0.004, 0.032, 0.024, 0.004, 0.005, 0.016, 0.021, 0.028, 0.018, respectively). Ktrans 90% and ADC were independent risk factors for predicting the two malignant groups. The AUC values, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of Ktrans 90%, ADC, Ktrans 90% + ADC were 0.720, 0.688, 0.798; 44.4%, 88.9%, 88.9%; 88.0%, 52.0%, 60.0%; 72.7%, 57.1%, 61.5%; 68.7%, 86.7%, 88.2%, respectively.
Conclusion: Quantitative DCE parameters combined with ADC values can assess different malignant groups based on molecular types of GC, which may provide new directions for the evaluation of GC.
Limitations: Firstly, the sample size is too small. Secondly, this study did not classify molecularly type of GC according to TCGA.
Funding for this study: No funding was received for this study.
Has your study been approved by an ethics committee? Yes
Ethics committee - additional information: This study was approved by the Ethics Review Committee of Henan cancer hospital.