Non-invasive bullet characterization by material decomposition in Photon counting CT
Author Block: B. M. Schaarschmidt1, J. Hegmanns1, J. Wulff1, V. Haase2, S. Faby2, C. Bäumer1, S. Zensen1, J. Haubold1, B. Hartung1; 1Essen/DE, 2Forchheim/DE
Purpose: Gunshot deaths are a worldwide health concern. Especially in patients with lodged bullets or forensic analyses, image-based bullet characterization is of major interest. Therefore, the present study investigated bullet differentiation from different materials using photon counting computed tomography (PCCT).
Methods or Background: Using a new research scan mode, six lead and three brass bullets were analyzed on a NAEOTOM Alpha PCCT system (Siemens Healthineers, Forchheim, Germany). For each scan, a set of four images was reconstructed using four different energy thresholds of the detector (20, 55, 72, and 90 keV).
Two independent readers placed three circular regions of interest (ROI) on the 20 keV threshold images on an OsiriX Workstation (Pixmeo SARL, Bernex, Switzerland). These ROIs were then automatically duplicated to the other threshold images. Dual energy indices (DEIs) were computed for the energy threshold pairs of 20/90 keV, 55/90 keV, and 72/90keV based on the measured HUmean and HUmax values.
Results or Findings: DEIs of lead and brass projectiles differed significantly, most notably for the 20/90 keV DEI HUmean (Qr40): lead: -0.085±0.021, brass: 0.024±0.048, p<0.001; HUmax (Qr40): lead: -0.093±0.011, brass: 0.023±0.057, p<0.001). For the 55/90 keV and 72/90 keV DEIs, differences between the two projectile materials decreased, but remained statistically significant.
Conclusion: In the DEIs derived from different energy threshold images obtained by PCCT, significant differences could be observed between lead and brass bullets. Therefore, PCCT might be a potential technique for bullet material analysis in both clinical and forensic imaging.
Limitations: Phantom study only.
Funding for this study: The study was performed at Siemens Healthineers facilities in Forchheim, Germany, with support from Viktor Haase and Sebastian Faby (employees of Siemens Healthineers AG).
Has your study been approved by an ethics committee? Not applicable
Ethics committee - additional information: As no human or animal subjects were investigated in this study, no approval by the local ethics committee was necessary.