The performance of the node reporting and data system 1.0 (Node- RADS) in staging patients with cervical carcinoma according to the new FIGO classification (2018)
Author Block: R. V. Ninkova, A. Calabrese, F. Curti, S. Riccardi, M. Gennarini, V. Miceli, A. Cupertino, C. Catalano, L. Manganaro; Rome/IT
Purpose: The aim of this study is to explore the diagnostic accuracy, specificity, sensitivity, positive and negative predictive value (PPV and NPV) of Node-RADS in assessing the risk of metastatic lymph node (LN) involvement of cervical cancer (CC) patients using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We also evaluated the applicability and feasibility of the score among three different readers with different years of experience.
Methods or Background: From December 2014 to June 2023, 140 patients were treated at our department. 68 patients underwent staging MRI, neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radical surgery, and were included in our study. MRI images were retrospectively reviewed and Node-RADS scores were assigned for the main bilateral pelvic LN stations. LNs were evaluated in a scoring category of 1 to 5 to assess risk of metastatic involvement: 1 (very low), 2 (low), 3 (equivocal), 4 (high), 5 (very high).
The adequacy of the score with respect to the actual neoplastic involvement was then evaluated by comparing it with the results of histological examination.
Results or Findings: The resulting sensitivities, specificities, PPVs, NPVs, and accuracies were 100%, 45%, 56%, 100%, 68% for >1, 92.8%, 72.5%, 70.3%, 93.5%, 80.9% for >2, 71.4%, 100%, 100%, 83.3%, 88.2% for >3, 42.9%, 100%, 100%, 71.4%, 76.4% for >4. The inter-observer agreement between the Node-RADS scores assigned by the senior reader compared with the scores assigned by junior reader 1 and the scores assigned by the senior reader compared with junior reader 2 was 0.888 and 0.738, respectively.
Conclusion: The Node-RADS score is a valid system for correct and standardised evaluation of LN stations, increasing diagnostic accuracy particularly for patients with CC. It represents an easily applicable standardisation system that can be useful in clinical practice, improving the proper management of patients with CC.
Limitations: The main limitation is the patient sample and the retrospective nature of the study.
Funding for this study: No funding was received for this study.
Has your study been approved by an ethics committee? Not applicable
Ethics committee - additional information: This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.