Assessment of adherence to ESUR guidelines in MRI acquisition for uterine cancers and its impact on multidisciplinary tumour boards (MDTs) management decisions: preliminary results
Author Block: G. Imbemba, S. Bottazzi, V. Celli, E. S. Trogu, F. L. Lia, M. Dolciami, L. D'Erme, E. Sala, B. Gui; Rome/IT
Purpose: To systematically evaluate the adherence of external pelvic MRI studies to ESUR guidelines in patients referred to the uterine MDTs at our tertiary centre, identifying the most frequent protocol deviations, assessing their impact on patient’s management.
Methods or Background: This retrospective, observational, single-centre study includes patients with cervical cancer (CC) and endometrial cancer (EC) discussed at the uterine MDTs between September 2024 and September 2025, whose external pelvic MRI scans are reviewed by a dedicated GYN radiologist.
Results or Findings: Between September 2024 and September 2025, 1820 cases were discussed and 607 required imaging revision. Of these, 277/607 were acquired at our Institution, while 330/607 were not and 110/330 (33%) were deemed non-compliant to ESUR guidelines (84 CC and 26 EC cases).
Among CC MRIs, the main causes of non-adherence were absence of axial-oblique T2-WI in 68/84, absence of axial-oblique DWI in 68/84, absence of DWI images in 14/84, slice thickness >4mm in 19/84 cases. Also, contrast media was administered in 72/84 cases (86%). 24/84 patients required repeating MRI. Among those who did not: in 38 cases the necessary information was obtained through PET/CT and in 22 cases MRI was deemed sufficient to exclude locally-advanced CC and proceed directly to surgery.
Among EC MRIs, the main non-adherence causes were: absence of axial-oblique DWI in 24/26 (92%), absence of axial-oblique T2-WI in 22/26 (85%), absence of axial-oblique post-contrast images in 25/26 (96%). Five patients required repeat MRI to assess the suitability for fertility-sparing procedures.
Conclusion: Adherence to ESUR guidelines for CC and EC MRI varies across institutions, missing recommended sequences and including non-recommended ones. This may reduce diagnostic accuracy, delay treatment initiation, and increase economic and environmental burden due to the unnecessary use of contrast agents.
Limitations: Na
Funding for this study: None
Has your study been approved by an ethics committee? Yes
Ethics committee - additional information: The study has been registered to the Ethical committee with the ID: ID8033.