Reliability of MRI in Detecting Lymph Node Involvement in Rectal Cancer
Author Block: N. Gündüz, M. Gezgin, B. Akgun, H. Seneldir, B. Atalay, O. Alimoglu, G. Erdem; Istanbul/TR
Purpose: Rectal cancer affects more than 700,000 people annually worldwide and accounts for 3.2% of cancer-related deaths.Regional lymph node(LN) status is a critical determinant in TNM staging, treatment planning, and prognosis.Magnetic resonance imaging(MRI) is the preferred modality for local staging, yet its diagnostic reliability for LN involvement remains debated. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance and reliability of MRI in assessing LN metastasis in rectal cancer.
Methods or Background: This retrospective study included patients with rectal cancer who underwent preoperative pelvic MRI and subsequent surgical resection between 2020 and 2023. Patients without either imaging or pathology data were excluded. Two abdominal radiologists(1–10 years of experience) independently reviewed MRIs using the 2016 ESGAR criteria.LN morphology(short-axis size, round shape, irregular border, heterogeneity) was assessed. Nodes ≥9 mm, 5–9 mm with ≥2 malignant features, or <5 mm with ≥3 features were classified as malignant; mucinous nodes were also considered malignant. In patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy, nodes >5 mm were classified malignant. MRI findings were compared with histopathology. Interobserver agreement was analyzed with kappa statistics.
Results or Findings: Of 68 patients, 42 were eligible (mean age 57.6 years; 24 male, 18 female).Histopathology confirmed LN metastases in 16 cases, all detected by MRI(sensitivity 100%). Of 26 LN-negative cases, MRI correctly identified 15 but overcalled 11, yielding specificity 57.7%. Overall diagnostic accuracy was 73.8%, with positive predictive value 59.3% and negative predictive value 100%. Interobserver agreement was excellent (κ=0.94).
Conclusion: MRI demonstrated high sensitivity but relatively low specificity in detecting LN involvement in rectal cancer, consistent with prior literature. Awareness of potential false positives is essential, and refinement of morphologic malignancy criteria may improve specificity.
Limitations: Single-center design, retrospective analysis, modest sample size, and inability to stratify histopathological LN subtypes may limit generalizability.
Funding for this study: No funding
Has your study been approved by an ethics committee? Yes
Ethics committee - additional information: Approved by Istanbul Medeniyet University Ethics Committee, 2023/0292