Performance of chest contrast-enhanced CT in pulmonary hypertension clinical grouping: a dual-center, expert-blinded analysis
Author Block: L. Nardone1, L. Cereser1, G. Agati1, P. Ciolli2, T. Nadarević3, C. Cicciò4, A. Borghesi2, R. Girometti1, C. Zuiani1; 1Udine/IT, 2Brescia/IT, 3Rijeka/HR, 4Negrar/IT
Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced CT imaging in classifying patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH) across international guidelines-derived clinical groups I-V. The analysis focused on quantifying the utility of CT in a blinded setting, comparing the results with those from the PH multidisciplinary team meeting (PH-MDTM).
Methods or Background: We retrospectively included 172 contrast-enhanced CT studies from patients with PH performed in two tertiary referral centers. Three chest-devoted radiologists, blinded to the clinical data, independently reviewed all the CTs, assigning probability percentages for each of the five PH groups. A consensus grouping hypothesis was reached by averaging the probabilities across readers, and this was compared with the PH-MDTM grouping. Accuracy and Cohen’s Kappa (k)-derived inter-reader agreement values with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated. The readers’ discriminatory power between individual PH groups was evaluated through areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) analyses.
Results or Findings: The expert-blinded consensus diagnosis agreed with the PH-MDTM in 124/172 cases (accuracy, 72%; k, 0.62; 95%CI, 0.50-0.70). When including the second most probable group, the readers correctly grouped 148/172 cases (accuracy, 86%; k, 0.81; 95%CI, 0.74-0.88). Discriminatory power analysis for individual groups demonstrated good readers’ performance, with AUC values ranging from 0.79-0.90 depending on the group.
Conclusion: This study highlights the value of contrast-enhanced CT in classifying PH according to clinical groups, with expert readers achieving substantial-to-almost perfect agreement with the PH-MDTM grouping and good discriminatory power for individual PH groups. The results suggest that CT imaging can serve as a reliable tool in the clinical work-up of PH patients, supporting its integration into multidisciplinary evaluations.
Limitations: Retrospective design, low number of group V PH cases.
Funding for this study: No funding was received for this study.
Has your study been approved by an ethics committee? Yes
Ethics committee - additional information: The ethics committee notification can be found under the number IRB 250/2023.