The value of dual-layer spectral-detector CT in detecting neuroendocrine tumour liver metastases: comparison with polyenergetic CT and Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR
Author Block: T. Xie, W. Liu, W. Deng, Y. Wang, W. Tang, Z. Zhou; Shanghai/CN
Purpose: The study aimed to investigate the value of dual-layer spectral-detector CT (DLCT) in detecting neuroendocrine tumour liver metastases (NETLM) and to compare the diagnostic performance of polyenergetic CT images (PEI), DLCT, and Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR.
Methods or Background: Seventy-two patients with suspected NETLM who underwent both DLCT and Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR within three weeks were retrospectively enrolled, and they were divided into dataset 1 and dataset 2. In dataset 1, virtual monoenergetic images (VMI) at 40-140 keV (VMI40-140, 10-keV interval) were reconstructed. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of NETLM were measured and compared between PEI and VMIs. In dataset 2, two readers independently evaluated the diagnostic performance of PEI (Set 1), VMI + PEI (Set 2), and Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR (Set 3) for detecting NETLM. Subgroup analysis stratified by lesion size was performed.
Results or Findings: In dataset 1, VMI40 exhibited highest SNR and CNR across all energy levels, which was significantly higher than that of PEI (P<0.01). In dataset 2, a total of 477 lesions were identified (396 metastases, 81 benign lesions). Adding VMI40 into PEI resulted in a significantly improved per-lesion AUC and sensitivity (AUC, Set 1: 0.85; Set 2: 0.90, P < 0.01; Sensitivity, Set 1: 0.76; Set 2: 0.86, P < 0.01). Set 3 achieved the highest per-lesion AUC of 0.97 and per-lesion sensitivity of 0.95. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that the difference in diagnostic performance was concentrated on lesions <10 mm.
Conclusion: Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR yielded the highest diagnostic accuracy for NETLM detection. DLCT should be an alternative choice, given the superior image quality and incremental diagnostic value of VMI40.
Limitations: The retrospective study design introduces the potential risk of selection bias.
Funding for this study: Funding was received from the Hong Kong, Macao, and Taiwan Cooperation Project of Scientific and Innovative Plan of Shanghai (22490760800).
Has your study been approved by an ethics committee? Yes
Ethics committee - additional information: This retrospective study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center (1612167–18). Informed consent was waived owing to the retrospective nature of the study.