Ultrasound-guided percutaneous irrigation of extra-shoulder calcific tendinopathy
Author Block: F. Serpi1, U. Viglino2, C. Messina1, S. Fusco1, S. Gitto1, F. Lacelli3, L. M. Sconfienza1, D. Albano1; 1Milan/IT, 2Genoa/IT, 3Pietra Ligure/IT
Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided percutaneous irrigation of calcific tendinopathy (US-PICT) applied out of the shoulder, comparing its effectiveness to US-PICT of the rotator cuff.
Methods or Background: Patients subjected to US-PICT for extra-shoulder calcific tendinitis (Case Group) were compared to those subjected to US-PICT of the rotator cuff (Control Group). We had pre-procedure VAS (visual analogue scale) pain score, 1-month and 3-month VAS of patients of the Case Group, pre-procedure, and 3-month VAS of patients of the Control Group.
Results or Findings: The Case Group consisted of 41 patients (27 women; mean age: 45±9years): 26 gluteus medius, 5 patellar tendon, 3 rectus femoris, 2 gluteus maximus, 2 common extensor tendon, 1 extensor carpi radialis longus, 1 pes anserinus, 1 peroneus longus. The Control Group included 41 patients (27 women; mean age: 47±11 years). The mean pre-procedure VAS of the Case Group was 8.8±0.7 with a significant (P<0.001) drop at 1 month (4.5±0.6) and 3 months (3.6±0.6). The mean pre-procedure VAS of the Control Group was 8±1.4 and dropped to 3.1±1.6 after 3 months (P<0.001). Post-treatment VAS at 3 months was not significantly different between two Groups (p=0.134). Similarly, the decrease of VAS from baseline to three months was not significantly different between the two Groups (p=0.264).
Conclusion: This study demonstrated the safety and effectiveness of US-PICT as a valuable therapeutic option for extra-shoulder calcific tendinitis, with similar clinical outcome to the same procedure performed in the rotator cuff.
Limitations: This study had a relatively small sample size with few cases in some localisations. A further limitation is the retrospective nature of the study, warranting prospective studies to compare the procedure with other conservative approaches and to understand how to manage these patients postoperatively.
Funding for this study: No funding was received for this study.
Has your study been approved by an ethics committee? Yes
Ethics committee - additional information: No information provided by the submitter.