Comparative CT findings in polytrauma: differences between living patients and post-mortem CT
Author Block: M. Palermo, R. A. Trapani, M. Pane, F. Tiralongo, S. Palmucci, P. V. Foti, C. Pomara, A. Basile; Catania/IT
Purpose: To compare CT findings in polytrauma patients due to traffict accident undergoing emergency CT scan with those observed in deceased patients examined with post-mortem CT (PMCT), focusing on the most frequent fatal injuries reported in the literature and our experience.
Methods or Background: We performed a retrospective evaluation of findings in patients who underwent emergency whole-body CT (WBCT) in our emergency department due to traffic accidents and of findings on PMCT of trauma victims performed in our Institution.
We also performed a literature review on main findings in this setting of patients and on more common fatal injuries detectable with PMCT.
Results or Findings: In living patients, WBCT typically demonstrated limb fractures, intracranial hemorrhages, thoracic and abdominal bleeding, and solid organ injuries, often supporting timely therapeutic decisions.
In deceased trauma victims, in accordance with Schmitt-Sody et al. , the predominant fatal injuries on PMCT were:
• Severe thoracic injuries (~65%), including massive hemothorax, pulmonary lacerations, and major vascular ruptures, especially aortic rupture.
• Severe cranio-cerebral trauma (~47%), such as extensive intracranial hemorrhage or destruction of brain parenchyma.
• Massive intra-abdominal hemorrhage (e.g., liver or splenic rupture), less frequent but still relevant.
Conclusion: CT in living polytrauma patients reveals a broad spectrum of injuries, many of which are potentially treatable if promptly identified. PMCT, on the other hand, consistently highlights the lesions that are most often fatal—severe thoracic hemorrhage, aortic rupture, extensive cranial trauma, and massive abdominal bleeding. Awareness of these patterns from PMCT can help radiologists maintain a higher index of suspicion during emergency reporting, facilitating early recognition of critical injuries and potentially life-threatening complications, ultimately improving patient management in the acute setting.
Limitations: Retrospective study, small number of cases
Funding for this study: No fundings received.
Has your study been approved by an ethics committee? Not applicable
Ethics committee - additional information: