Up-to-date paediatric sonographic reference values and percentile curves for abdominal organ dimensions in a large European cohort
Author Block: E. Höhne, S. Fischer, T. Vogl, V. Koch, S. Mahmoudi, I. Yel, K. Eichler, L. D. Grünewald; Frankfurt/DE
Purpose: Accurate assessment of liver, spleen, and kidney size is essential in pediatric diagnostics, where ultrasound provides a safe, accessible, and non-invasive tool. This study aimed to establish contemporary, population-based reference values for abdominal organ dimensions in children and adolescents in order to reflect current growth patterns and support reliable clinical decision-making.
Methods or Background: A total of 27,696 abdominal ultrasound examinations performed in children and adolescents (0–18 years) between 2000 and 2025 at a large tertiary referral center in Germany were retrospectively evaluated. Organ dimensions were measured by experienced pediatric radiologists using standardized protocols. Age-related percentile curves (P3–P97) were established with Generalized Additive Models for Location, Scale, and Shape (GAMLSS) to account for non-linear growth dynamics.
Results or Findings: Organ-specific datasets included 12,254 livers, 12,703 spleens, 16,254 right kidneys, and 16,516 left kidneys. All organs exhibited characteristic non-linear growth trajectories. No significant sex-related differences were identified for spleen (p = 0.195), liver (p = 0.517), right kidney (p = 0.712), or left kidney (p = 0.797), supporting the use of unified reference values. The left kidney consistently exceeded the right in size (p < 0.0001), with a mean difference of 2–5 mm.
Conclusion: This study provides updated, population-specific percentile curves for liver, spleen, and kidney dimensions, derived from one of the largest pediatric ultrasound datasets in Central Europe. These normative values offer a robust reference framework to support the differentiation between physiological growth variation and pathological organ enlargement in children and adolescents.
Limitations: The retrospective, single-center design and the absence of anthropometric parameters such as height or weight may limit the generalizability of the presented age-based reference values.
Funding for this study: No funding was obtained for this study.
Has your study been approved by an ethics committee? Yes
Ethics committee - additional information: This retrospective cohort study was approved by the institutional review board (approval #2024-1854_1) with waiver of informed consent.