Photon-Counting CT at Radiography Equivalent Dose: Impact on Quantitative Lung Parameters
Author Block: J. Kroschke1, B. J. Kerber1, O. Von Stackelberg2, F. Ensle1, L. Jungblut1, M. O. Wielpütz3, T. Frauenfelder1, H-U. Kauczor4, O. Weinheimer4; 1Zurich/CH, 2Mannheim/DE, 3Greifswald/DE, 4Heidelberg/DE
Purpose: Photon-counting computed tomography (PCCT) enables dose reductions to levels comparable to chest radiography, which is of clinical interest for applications such as lung cancer screening. However, quantitative CT (QCT) metrics may be altered at ultra-low dose (ULD). This study evaluated the impact of dose reduction on lung QCT.
Methods or Background: In 101 patients (mean age 61.0±12.5 years), non-contrast low-dose (LD-CT, CTDIvol: ~0.64±0.15 mGy) and radiography-comparable ULD-CT (~0.11±0.03 mGy) scans were acquired in the same session on PCCT, with LD-CT as reference. Using YACTA software fully automated QCT analysis was performed on images reconstructed with a soft kernel (Br36u, strength level 3) for lung parenchyma and a hard kernel (Bl64u, strength level 3) for airways. Two expert readers assessed image quality, emphysema, and airway wall features.
Results or Findings: ULD-CT showed a 66.5% increase in noise for Br36u and 63.9% for Bl64u, reflected in lower visual image quality (p<0.001, κ=0.59). Automated airway segmentation decreased (−41.4, p<0.001), consistent with fewer visible generations (p<0.001, ICC=0.81). Wall percentage remained stable across dose levels, with no significant differences in visually assessed wall thickening (R1 p=0.89, R2 p=0.20).
At ULD, mean lung density (MLD) was reduced 13.5 HU (p<0.001; r²=0.93), leading to a lower 15th percentile (Perc15: −20.2 HU, p<0.001; r²=0.93). Applying a sponge model correction for volume differences decreased bias (MLD: −12.5 HU; Perc15: −19.9 HU) and improved correlations (r²=0.97–0.98). Visually, emphysema extent was consistently underestimated at ULD (p<0.001, κ=0.92).
Conclusion: PCCT at radiography-comparable dose alters QCT metrics, particularly lung density and emphysema quantification. While sponge model correction mitigates these effects, both automated and visual emphysema assessments remain biased, highlighting limitations of the conventional −950 HU cut-off at ULD.
Limitations: Single-center, single-vendor study with limited patient numbers. No HR-CT as reference standard.
Funding for this study: No external funding was provided for this study.
Has your study been approved by an ethics committee? Yes
Ethics committee - additional information: Approval for this study was granted by the local ethics committee (KEK-ZH-NR. 2022-D0008)