Effectiveness and Safety of Uterine Artery Embolization in Managing Postpartum Hemorrhage Associated with Placenta Accreta: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Author Block: L. Habiro Alves1, G. Martin1, A. C. Servidoni2, H. Provinciatto3, G. Franceschini Machado1, K. Miller4, B. Taneja5, A. K. Taneja6, A. Yousif7; 1São Paulo/BR, 2New Haven, CT/US, 3Ribeirao Preto/BR, 4Sao Paulo/BR, 5Boston, MA/US, 6Miami, FL/US, 7El Paso, TX/US
Purpose: Placenta accreta spectrum disorder is a pregnancy complication associated with a substantially increased risk of maternal mortality. With the advancements of interventional radiology, uterine artery embolization has emerged as an effective minimally-invasive alternative to avoid hysterectomy for severe postpartum hemorrhage. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to evaluate whether uterine artery embolization is an effective and safe method to manage post-partum hemorrhage associated with placenta accreta spectrum.
Methods or Background: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central were systematically searched for studies published from inception until September 2025. A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted through RStudio version 4.4.1 to pool prevalences and rates. The Cochrane Collaboration’s Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies of Interventions tool was used for quality assessment.
Results or Findings: Six studies including 215 participants were analyzed. The pooled clinical success rate of uterine artery embolization was 85.0% (95% CI, 77.7–90.2), while the pooled prevalence of hysterectomy after clinical failure was 7.9% (95% CI, 4.9–12.5). Postoperative complications occurred in 19.0% of cases (95% CI, 6.2–45.5) and the pooled mean estimated blood loss was 1825 mL (95% CI, 1116–2533).
Conclusion: Uterine artery embolization is an effective and safe interventional radiology strategy for PPH due to placenta accreta, offering high success rates while preserving uterine function and reducing surgical morbidity.
Limitations: First, there are no published randomized controlled trials on management of PHH secondary to PAS, which restricts the number of studies evaluated and overall statistical power. Second, long-term maternal outcomes, such as subsequent fertility and menstrual function, were not consistently reported, limiting the ability to assess the broader safety profile.
Funding for this study: None
Has your study been approved by an ethics committee? Not applicable
Ethics committee - additional information: