Author Block: W. Peng, L. Wan, X. Tong, F. Yang, S. Wang, L. Li, H. Zhang; Beijing/CN
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to conduct a clinical assessment of deep learning reconstruction (DLR)-based rectal MRI in comparison to standard MRI.
Methods or Background: Patients with biopsy-proven rectal adenocarcinoma from November/2022 to May/2023 were prospectively enrolled in the study to undertake rectal MRI, including protocols using standard fast spin-echo (FSEstandard) and DLR-based accelerated FSE (FSEDL). Imaging quality including signal-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-noise ratio (CNR), as well as subjective scoring based on Likert scale were assessed by two radiologists. Diagnostic performance including T-staging, N-staging, EMVI, and MRF was further evaluated by five radiologists. The time consumed in the application of each diagnostic metric was documented for reading efficiency analysis.
Results or Findings: In total, 117 patients (77 males; age range 21 – 77 years) were enrolled in the study; 60 patients undertook radical surgery. DLR enabled a reduction of 65% in acquisition time. Moderate to excellent intra- and interreader agreement was achieved for all assessment metrics. FSEDL exhibited higher SNR, CNR, and subjective scores in noise, tumour margin clarity, visualisation of bowel wall layering and rectal mesorectal fascia, overall image quality, and diagnostic confidence (P < 0.05). FSEDL was rated higher T-staging accuracy by junior readers (reader 1, 58% vs 70%, P = 0.016; reader 3, 60% vs 76%, P = 0.021), with comparable performance in evaluating N-staging, EMVI, and MRF. No difference was found concerning diagnostic performance by senior readers (P > 0.05). FSEDL exhibited shorter diagnostic time in T-staging and overall evaluation by all readers, as well as in EMVI and MRF by junior readers (P < 0.05).
Conclusion: FSEDL is clinically feasible for rectal MRI, which could facilitate improved image quality and reading efficiency than FSE standard, while reducing 65% acquisition time. Moreover, it has potential in helping junior radiologists improve the accuracy of T-staging.
Limitations: This was a single-centre study.
Funding for this study: Funding was received from the CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences (CIFMS) [grant number 2021-I2M-C&T-A-017], Capital's Funds for Health Improvement and Research (CFH) [grant number 2022-2-4024], the National Natural Science Foundation of China [grant number 81971589], 2020 SKY Imaging Research Fund [grant number Z-2014-07-2003-01], and CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences (CIFMS) [grant number 2022-I2M-C&T-B-077].
Has your study been approved by an ethics committee? Yes
Ethics committee - additional information: This prospective study received approval from our institutional review board, and written informed consent was obtained from all participants.