Comparison of PET/CT with 18F-FDG and 68Ga-FAPI in the detection of liver tumors
Author Block: E. Davydova, M. A. Komarova, V. Е. Sinitsyn, A. Martinovich, O. Ryzhova; Moscow/RU
Purpose: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of FAPI PET/CT and FDG PET/CT in patients with liver tumor.
Methods or Background: 15 patients (mean age 57,5 y.o, 7male/8 female) diagnosed with liver cancer who underwent FAPI and FDG PET/CT between 7 days were included in the study. 4pts were examined to detect progression of the underlying disease (had the previous treatment). The all liver lesions had morphological verification (11pts had cholangiocarcinoma G1-3, 2pts. - hepatocellular carcinoma, 1- intraductal papillary tumor of the bile duct and 1pts - calcifying nested stromal-epithelial tumor). Uptake intensity(SUVmax) and target-to-background ratio(TBR) of the primary liver tumor and lymph nodes metastasis were compared between two imaging modalities. Sensitivity(Se), specificity(Sp), positive predictive value(PPV), negative predictive value(NPV) and accuracy(Ac) were calculated for each modality on a per-region basis.
Results or Findings: 14 pts were found primary tumor and 3 pts of them had metastases in regional lymph nodes or lung. There was a better contrast with 68Ga-FAPI, with SUVmax of the liver tumors of 14,9 [8,94-23,48] compared with SUVmax of 7,81 [3,55-10,21] of liver tumors with 18F-FDG (p=0,02). The TBR of primary tumor were higher in 68Ga-FAPI compared with 18F-FDG - 10,56[4,15-16,46] vs. 2,5[1,17-3,67] respectively, p=0,0014. For detection of primary liver tumor and metastasis on region based level Se, Sp, PPV, NPV and Ac of Ga-68 FAPI PET/CT were higher than F18-FDG PET/CT (97,3%, 71,43 %, 90,00%, 90,91% and 90,20% vs. 78,38%, 57,14%, 82,86%,50,00% and 72,55 %, respectively).
Conclusion: FAPI PET-CT is a very promising tool for evaluation of patients with liver tumor because more accurate than FDG PET-CT. High level of FAPI uptake in the primary hepatic lesions is indicate the potential of FAP-targeted radionuclide therapy.
Limitations: No
Funding for this study: Without funding
Has your study been approved by an ethics committee? Not applicable
Ethics committee - additional information: