Quantitative CEUS Assessment of Thyroid Nodules
Author Block: A. Borlea, S. Bunceanu, D. I. Stoian; Timisoara/RO
Purpose: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of quantitative contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) parameters in differentiating benign from malignant thyroid nodules.
Methods or Background: Thirty thyroid nodules with histopathologic confirmation (15 benign, 15 malignant: 12 papillary, 2 follicular, 1 medullary) underwent CEUS. Quantitative time–intensity curve (TIC) analysis included: Arrival Time (AT), Rise Time (RT), Time to Peak (TTP), Fall Time or Wash-out Time (FT), Mean Transit Time (mTT), Peak Intensity (PKI), Area Under Curve (AUC), Wash-in AUC (WiAUC), Wash-out AUC (WoAUC), Ascending Slope (AS), Descending Slope (DS), Slope Ratio (SR), and mean TIC.
Results or Findings: Malignant nodules showed significantly shorter AT (12.3 ± 3.5 vs. 16.7 ± 4.2 s, p=0.01), faster RT (7.1 ± 2.2 vs. 9.8 ± 2.6 s, p=0.02), and earlier TTP (19.4 ± 4.6 vs. 26.5 ± 5.3 s, p<0.01). FT was prolonged (31.2 ± 8.4 vs. 22.5 ± 6.7 s, p=0.02), yielding longer mTT (38.3 ± 9.2 vs. 32.3 ± 7.1 s, p=0.04). PKI was higher in malignant nodules (28.6 ± 5.7 vs. 21.4 ± 4.9 a.u., p=0.01). Perfusion integrals were increased: AUC 1520 vs. 980 a.u.*s (p=0.01), WiAUC 650 vs. 410 (p=0.02), WoAUC 870 vs. 570 (p=0.03). Slopes were steeper in malignancy: AS 2.3 vs. 1.6 a.u./s (p=0.03), DS 2.1 vs. 1.3 (p=0.04), with higher SR (0.91 vs. 0.78). ROC analysis showed AUC 0.86 for TTP and 0.88 for PKI; combining PKI+TTP achieved 0.92 sensitivity and 0.88 specificity.
Conclusion: Malignant thyroid nodules present rapid wash-in, higher peak enhancement, and delayed wash-out. Quantitative CEUS parameters, particularly TTP and PKI, significantly improve diagnostic accuracy and may complement TIRADS and elastography in risk stratification.
Limitations: Small, single-center cohort; larger studies needed for threshold validation.
Funding for this study: No funding
Has your study been approved by an ethics committee? Yes
Ethics committee - additional information: UMFT Victor Babes Ethics Committee