Can MRI accurately assess the TN staging of rectal cancer patients with local regrowth during watchful waiting?
Author Block: X. Ou, B. M. Geubels, D. M. J. Lambregts, B. Grotenhuis, G. L. Beets, R. G. H. Beets-Tan, M. Maas; Amsterdam/NL
Purpose: Local regrowth during watchful waiting occurs in +/-25% of patients. Salvage surgery is possible in the vast majority. MRI is used for regrowth staging, but its accuracy is unknown. The aim is to evaluate the accuracy of MRI for preoperative TN-staging of rectal cancer patients with local regrowth during organ preservation.
Methods or Background: Rectal cancer patients identified with local regrowth during watchful waiting all underwent salvage surgery (TME or local excision). Patients who underwent local excision as salvage surgery were excluded from N-status analyses if their follow-up after local excision was < 24 months. An expert radiologist scored the ymrTN-stage on pre-surgery MRIs. The ymrT and ymrN-stages were compared with final ypT and ypN-stages at histopathology. For analysis, T0, T1 and T2 were combined as T0-2 and T3 and T4 combined as T3-4; N1 and N2 were combined as N+. Diagnostic performance (accuracy, sensitivity, specificity) were calculated.
Results or Findings: Among these patients, 26 had ypT-stage available (17 ypT0-2, 9 ypT3-4) and 22 had ypN-stage available (15 ypN0, 7ypN+). The MRI-to-surgery interval ranged from 2 to 19 weeks (median: 7 weeks). 20 had luminal regrowth, one had nodal regrowth, and six had both. Accuracy, sensitivity and specificity for ypT-staging were 81%, 76% and 89%. Overstaging occurred in 15%. Accuracy, sensitivity and specificity for ypN-staging were 82%, 80% and 82%. Understaging occurred in 14%.
Conclusion: MRI can accurately stage local regrowth during watchful waiting before surgery. In ypT-staging, overstaging is common, while ypN-staging is more prone to understaging.
Limitations: Multiple readers need to be included to assess the interobserver agreement and evaluate the impact of radiologists' experience on ymrTN-staging accuracy. Sample size is rather small. Selection bias needs to be considered for the highly selected group.
Funding for this study: Not applicable for this study.
Has your study been approved by an ethics committee? Not applicable
Ethics committee - additional information: Not applicable for this study.