Comparison of diagnostic guidelines for hepatocellular carcinoma on gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver magnetic resonance imaging
Jeong-Hee Yoon, Seoul / Korea, Republic of
Author Block: J-H. Yoon, Y. K. Kim, W. Chang, J-I. Choi, B. J. Park, J-Y. Choi, H. S. Park, C. H. Lee, J. M. Lee; Seoul/KRPurpose: Non-invasive diagnostic guidelines for HCC vary, especially regarding hepatobiliary agent-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (HBA-MRI). We evaluated the diagnostic performance of four guidelines and readers’ judgment in diagnosing HCC using HBA-MRI in high-risk patients.Methods or Background: This retrospective study included treatment-naive patients at risk of HCC who underwent HBA-MRI from January 2015 to June - Four radiologists, using a pre-programmed algorithm on a web-based platform, independently reviewed focal liver lesions (FLLs) according to four guidelines: American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases/Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (AASLD/LI-RADS), Korean Liver Cancer Association-National Cancer Center (KLCA-NCC), European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL), Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver (APASL). Readers’ judgment was also recorded. The guidelines’ diagnostic performance was compared in all patients and subgroups. Additionally, the diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) was assessed.
Results or Findings: We analysed 2,445 FLLs in 2,237 patients; - 3% (1,694/2,445) were HCC. KLCA-NCC demonstrated the highest accuracy (80.0%), followed by APASL, AASLD/LI-RADS (77.8%, 76.4%), and EASL (75.1%). APASL exhibited the highest sensitivity (89.1%), followed by KLCA-NCC (78.2%), while AASLD/LI-RADS displayed the highest specificity (89.6%), followed by EASL (88.1%). The DORs were 20.7 for AASLD/LI-RADS, 18.9 for KLCA-NCC, 16.8 for EASL, and 8.9 for APASL. The readers’ judgment demonstrated higher accuracy than the guidelines (86.0%, P<0.001). In small (<20 mm) FLLs, Eastern guidelines showed higher accuracy than Western guidelines (P<0.001). Diagnostic accuracy of guidelines was 71.8%–79.5% in cirrhosis and 75.2%–82.3% in chronic hepatitis B without cirrhosis.
Conclusion: Eastern guidelines demonstrated high sensitivity, while Western guidelines displayed high specificity. KLCA-NCC achieved the highest accuracy, and AASLD/LI-RADS exhibited the highest DOR.Limitations: The retrospective design inevitably introduced bias which we attempted to minimise by including a large population.Funding for this study: This work is financially supported by Bayer.Has your study been approved by an ethics committee? YesEthics committee - additional information: This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Seoul National University Hospital and participating institutions.