Automatic detection of bone fragility in radiographic images using deep-learning with multicentre cohort datasets
Author Block: G. Gatineau1, G. Nguyen2, M. De Gruttola2, K. Hind2, M. Kuzma3, J. Payer3, G. Guglielmi4, A. Fahrleitner-Pammer5, D. Hans1; 1Lausanne/CH, 2Geneva/CH, 3Bratislava/SK, 4Foggia/IT, 5Graz/AT
Purpose: This study aimed to assess the accuracy and efficacy of an novel AI-driven radiographic processing tool designed to opportunistically identify individuals predisposed to very high bone fragility risk, addressing a prevailing clinical challenge in the field.
Methods or Background: From four multinational cohorts, 4,764 paired lumbar-spine X-ray DICOM and DXA scans (GE and Hologic systems) were acquired within 6 months. A total of 3,369 cases from three cohorts were allocated for training and validation of a new AI-bone fragility detection tool (Medimaps Group, Switzerland). Three hundred cases were designated as internal test set. Two hundred and seventy-one cases from the fourth cohort acted as an external test set. Very high fracture risk was defined using DXA parameters as the ground truth: BMD T-score≤-2.5 and a trabecular bone score (TBS)<1.23.
Results or Findings: The mean age and BMI of the sample (5.2% male) were 66.1±10.8 y and 26.4±5.0 kg/m2 respectively. Using the combination of DXA-derived BMD and TBS, 17.5% were identified at very high fracture risk. Uncertainties were obtained with a 95% confidence interval (CI) using binomial distribution approximations. The accuracy of the AI tool for the internal test set, was 0.85 (95% CI: 0.76-0.94), specificity 0.91 (0.8-0.99), and sensitivity 0.69 (0.53-0.84). For external validation, the accuracy, specificity, and sensitivity were 0.80 (0.69-0.87), 0.88 (0.77-0.99), and 0.62 (0.47-0.77) respectively.
Conclusion: This AI-enhanced radiographic tool exhibits potential in accurately detecting individuals at very high risk of bone fragility. Its robust specificity underscores its capacity to reduce false-positive rates, emphasising its clinical utility for efficient patient screening.
Limitations: While this study demonstrates promise, further development and validation will be beneficial, using larger and more diverse samples.
Funding for this study: This study was funded by the Fond National Suisse 32473B_156978 and 320030_188886.
Has your study been approved by an ethics committee? Yes
Ethics committee - additional information: This study was ethically approved by the WMA declaration of Helsinki. Ethical Principles For Medical Research Involving Human Subjects