Hit and miss: locating the exact site of gastrointestinal tract perforations as a challenge
Author Block: T. B. Plojović, A. Pavlovic, D. Markovic, D. Janjic, J. Vukmirovic, K. Lazarevic, B. Jovandić, D. Vasin, S. Hasanagic; Belgrade/RS
Purpose: The objective of our study was to analyse the capacity of CT (Computerized Tomography) to identify the site of gastrointestinal perforation (GI) and to determine which radiological signs, either direct or indirect, are the most predictive.
Methods or Background: Between September 2022 and September 2023, we retrospectively studied 100 patients presenting with pneumoperitoneum on CT. All patients had surgically proven gastrointestinal tract perforation. Two expert radiologists, with no previous knowledge of the clinical histories or the surgical results, evaluated the CT scans.
Results or Findings: The locations of the perforations found during surgery in the 100 patients were as follows: 36 stomach or duodenum; 15 small intestine; 12 appendix; 16 ascending, transverse or descending colon; and 21 sigma/rectum. The Kappa correlation coefficient between radiologists for predicting the localisation of the perforation in our study was high. The two most frequent signs observed in our study were free extraluminal air in the supramesocolic space and gas bubbles adjacent to the wall. The prediction of the perforation site in the gastrointestinal tract using CT coincided with the surgical findings in 80 out of 100 patients. In 20 patients, the prediction did not concur with the findings. In 15 cases, CT identified an incorrect perforation site while in 5 patients, CT did not identify the location of the GI perforation. The most sensitive sign in our study was the presence of free extraluminal air in the supramesocolic compartment. The most specific ones were the presence of abscesses and focal wall defects.
Conclusion: CT can locate gastrointestinal perforation sites with a high sensitivity and excellent interobserver correlation.
Limitations: This was a retrospective study.
Funding for this study: No funding was received for this study.
Has your study been approved by an ethics committee? Yes
Ethics committee - additional information: This study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee.