Fully automatic AI-driven assessment in coronary CT angiography for intermediate stenosis: a comparative study with quantitative coronary angiography and fractional flow reserve
Jung-In Jo, Seoul / Korea, Republic of
Learning Objectives
Author Block: J-I. Jo, H. J. J. Koo, J-W. Kang, D. H. Yang; Seoul/KRPurpose: Limited data exists on direct comparison of AI-driven automatic coronary stenosis assessment in coronary CT angiography (CCTA) to quantitative coronary angiography (QCA). This study aims to compare AI-based coronary stenosis evaluation in CCTA with its quantitative counterpart of coronary angiography and invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR).Methods or Background: In this single-center retrospective study, 215 intermediate coronary lesions, with QCA diameter stenosis between 20% and 80%, were assessed from 195 symptomatic patients (mean age 61 years, 149 men, 585 coronary arteries). For stenosis quantification in CCTA, an AI-driven research prototype (Siemens Healthineers, Germany) was used (AI-CCTA). Diagnostic accuracy of AI-CCTA on per-vessel basis was assessed, using invasive coronary angiography stenosis grading (with > 50% stenosis) or invasive FFR (< - 80) as reference standards. AI-driven diameter stenosis was then correlated with QCA results and expert manual measurements.
Results or Findings: Among 585 coronary arteries, disease prevalence as determined by invasive angiography (≥ 50%) was - 5%. AI-CCTA showed sensitivity of 71.7%, specificity of 89.8%, positive predictive value of 85.9%, negative predictive value of 78.5%, and area under the curve (AUC) of 0.81. For 215 intermediate lesions assessed using QCA and FFR, diagnostic performance of AI-CCTA was moderate, with AUC of 0.63 for both QCA and FFR. In measuring degree of stenosis, AI-CCTA demonstrated a moderate correlation with QCA (r = 0.42, p < 0.001), which was notably better than results from manual quantification versus QCA (r = 0.26, p=0.001).
Conclusion: The AI-powered automated CCTA analysis showed promising results when compared to invasive angiography. While AI-CCTA demonstrated a moderate relationship with QCA in intermediate coronary stenosis lesions, its results appeared to surpass those of manual evaluations.Limitations: Individuals with stents or a history of coronary-artery bypass grafting were excluded from analysis.Funding for this study: No funding was provided for this study.Has your study been approved by an ethics committee? YesEthics committee - additional information: Approval from the Institutional Review Board of Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea