Can we measure extreme brain iron content with Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping?
Author Block: C. Birkl1, M. Panzer1, C. Kames2, A. Rauscher2, B. Glodny1, E. R. R. Gizewski1, H. Zoller1; 1Innsbruck/AT, 2Vancouver, BC/CA
Purpose: Aceruloplasminemia (ACP) is a rare autosomal recessive disorder characterized by progressive iron accumulation in multiple organs, including the brain, liver, and pancreas. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is commonly used to detect iron overload, with Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping (QSM) emerging as a promising method for assessing brain iron levels. Despite its potential, QSM faces challenges such as susceptibility artifacts and a lack of standardization. This prospective study aimed to evaluate the performance of different QSM algorithms in measuring brain iron in patients with severe iron overload, compared to healthy controls.
Methods or Background: QSM images were acquired using a 3D multi-echo gradient echo sequence in three patients with ACP and three healthy controls. We evaluated six QSM algorithms: (I) Fast Nonlinear Susceptibility Inversion (FANSI), (II) Improved Sparse Linear Equation and Least-Squares (iLSQR), (III) Morphology-Enabled Dipole Inversion (MEDI), (IV) Streaking Artifact Reduction (STAR) QSM with Rapid Open-source Minimum Spanning Tree (ROMEO) phase unwrapping, (V) STAR QSM with Laplacian phase unwrapping, and (VI) Multi-Echo Rapid Two-Step (MERTS) QSM. Regional susceptibility values were analyzed in the caudate nucleus, putamen, globus pallidus, and thalamus.
Results or Findings: We observed significant variability in susceptibility values across the different algorithms for patients with ACP. Among the algorithms tested, only one showed consistently elevated susceptibility values in the globus pallidus of ACP patients compared to healthy controls. Many susceptibility maps showed signal dropouts in brain regions with extreme iron overload.
Conclusion: Our findings suggest that only a subset of QSM algorithms reliably reflect extreme brain iron deposition. Additionally, the study highlights that performing echo combination prior to phase unwrapping and background field removal may introduce artifacts, resulting in lower-than-expected susceptibility values due to signal dropouts.
Limitations: A limitation is the small sample size.
Funding for this study: No funding was received for this study.
Has your study been approved by an ethics committee? Yes
Ethics committee - additional information: The study was approved by the local ethics committee (number 1270/2021)