Analysis of adverse events after peripheral arteriovenous malformation embolisation: single Korean referral vascular anomalies centre experience
Jiyoon Ban, Gangnam-gu, Seoul / Korea, Republic of
Author Block: J. Ban1, S. Y. Lee1, K. B. Park1, D-I. Kim1, S. S. Yang1, Y. S. Do2; 1Seoul/KR, 2Gyeonggi/KRPurpose: Peripheral arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) are extremely difficult to manage for their functional importance and cosmetic problems. This single-centre retrospective study was conducted to identify factors that contribute to adverse events (AEs) after embolisation of AVMs using percutaneous sclerotherapy.Methods or Background: A retrospective review of patients who underwent sclerotherapy of AVMs from 1997 to 2022 was performed. 1273 procedures in 444 patients (median age: - 0 years; interquartile range: 18.0-38.0 years) were evaluated. The AVM characteristics and details of AEs were analysed. According to Society of Interventional Radiology guidelines, AEs were divided into minor and major. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to find factors associated with AEs.
Results or Findings: Ethanol (- 2% of procedures, mean 26.2ml per session) and coils (33.4% of procedures, mean 31.4 coils) were mainly used for sclerotherapy. Upper extremity AVMs were most common (39.6%), followed by lower extremity (33.9%), abdomen-pelvis (22.4%), and thorax and neck (4.1%). 297 of 1273 procedures (23.3%) had sclerotherapy-related adverse events (261 were minor and 36 were major adverse events). Skin damage and transient nerve injury were most frequent in AEs. Coil used OR, 0.3672; 95% CI, 0.2607-0.5172, P<0.0001), diffuse AVMs (OR, 0.6837; 95% CI, 0.5095-0.9174; P=0.0112), body AVMs (OR, 0.522; 95% CI, 0.3685-0.7393; P=0.0003), and skin non-involvement (OR, 0.5741; 95% CI, 0.4268-0.7721; P=0.0012) were negatively associated with AEs.
Conclusion: In our ethanol and coil based AVM sclerotherapy, 297 AEs were developed after 1273 sessions of AVM sclerotherapy (- 3%). Most AEs were minor. Use of coil, diffuse involvement, body AVM and skin non-involvement showed protective effect on AEs.
Limitations: Our study was limited to a single centre and based on retrospective review of previous procedures.Funding for this study: No funding was received for this study.Has your study been approved by an ethics committee? Not applicableEthics committee - additional information: Ethical approval was not sought for the present study because this was a retrospective study conducted at Samsung Medical Center with an observational nature.