Ascites in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing transarterial chemoembolisation: the more, the worse?
Lukas Müller, Mainz / Germany
Author Block: L. Müller1, D. Bender1, F. Stöhr1, A. Mähringer-Kunz1, J. Mittler1, A. Weinmann1, R. Klöckner2, F. Hahn1; 1Mainz/DE, 2Lübeck/DEPurpose: Preliminary work has shown that portal hypertension plays a key role for the prognosis in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) undergoing transarterial chemoembolisation (TACE). Specifically, the presence of ascites appears to be a strong negative predictor for these patients. However, it remains unclear whether different ascites volumes influence prognosis. Therefore, the aim of this work was to investigate the influence of different ascites volumes on survival for patients with HCC undergoing TACE.Methods or Background: A total of 351 patients with HCC treated at our tertiary referral centre between 2010 and 2020 were included. In patients with ascites, the fluid was segmented, and the volume quantified by slice-wise addition using contrast-enhanced CT imaging. The patients with ascites were subclassified using cut-off values previously suggested for patients with liver cirrhosis: A0 = 0ml, A1 ≤ 300ml, and A2 > 300ml ascites. Median overall survival (OS) was calculated.Results or Findings: Ascites was present in 102 (- 1%) patients. Median OS without ascites was 16.5 months, and therefore significantly longer than in patients with ascites (6.4 months, P<0.001). Patients were further classified as n(A0)=249(70.9%), n(A1)=43(12.3%), n(A2)=59(16.8%). The corresponding median OS yielded 16.5, 9.9 and 4.0 months for A0-A2, respectively (overall P<0.001, pairwise comparison A0 vs A1 P=0.03, A1 vs A2 P<0.001).
Conclusion: Ascites in patients with HCC undergoing TACE is associated with a bad prognosis. Our results indicate an association between the amount of ascites and OS. Not only the presence but also the amount of ascites is relevant. The quantitative assessment applied here can help improve clinical decision making.Limitations: The retrospective design and single centre nature of the study were identified as limitations.Funding for this study: This study was funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation); project number: Has your study been approved by an ethics committee? YesEthics committee - additional information: The study has been approved by the local ethics committee responsible (Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany).